New, Improved, Comprehensive, and
Automated Driver's License Test and Vision Screening System
Final
Report 559(1)
Prepared
by:
ESRA
Consulting Corporation™
1650
South Dixie Highway, Third Floor
Boca
Raton, Florida 33432 USA
MAY
2005
Prepared
for:
Arizona Department of Transportation
206 South 17th Avenue Phoenix, Arizona 85007
in cooperation with
U.S.
Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration
The
contents of the report reflect the views of the authors who are
responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented
herein. The authors assume no liability for the use or misuse of
any information, opinions, or conclusions contained in this
report. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official
views or policies of the Arizona Department of Transportation or
the Federal Highway Administration. This report does not
constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. Trade or
manufacturers’ names which may appear herein are cited only
because they are considered essential to the objectives of the
report. The
U.S.
Government and The State of Arizona do not endorse products or
manufacturers.
ESRA
CONSULTING CORPORATION DISCLAIMER
Neither
ESRA Consulting Corporation (ESRA), its affiliates, its
associates, nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees,
makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal
liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or
usefulness of any information, apparatus, product or process
disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe
privately owned rights. References herein to any specific
commercial product, process, or service by trade name,
trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily
constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring
by ESRA or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors
expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of
ESRA or any agency thereof. This report is for informational
purposes only. Readers are encouraged to confirm the information
contained herein with other sources. The information is not
intended to replace medical advice offered by physicians.
Reliance on any information in this report is solely at your own
risk. ESRA Consulting Corporation is not responsible or liable
for any direct, indirect, consequential, special, exemplary, or
other damages arising from any use of any product, information,
idea, or instruction contained in this report and all
publications and presentations and/ or implementations therefrom.
Notice
is hereby provided that a patent application has been filed on
one or more of the systems and methods described herein.
Notice
is hereby provided that ESRA may be involved in development and/
or marketing of products in the systems and/ or methods
described herein.
In the event that consideration is given to any component in the system
described herein in which ESRA may have a marketing arrangement
or other involvement, at the time of such consideration, full
disclosure will made.
Technical
Report Documentation Page
|
1.
Report No. FHWA-AZ-04-559(1)
|
2.
Government Accession No.
|
3.
Recipient’s Catalog No.
|
|
4.
Title and Subtitle
SPR
559 - New, Improved, Comprehensive, and Automated
Driver’s License Test and Vision Screening System
|
5.
Report Date May 2005
|
|
6.
Performing Organization Code
|
|
7.
Authors
Sandy H. Straus
|
8.
Performing Organization Report No.
|
|
9.
Performing Organization Name and
Address
ESRA Consulting
Corporation 1650
South Dixie Highway, 3rd
Floor Boca Raton, Florida
33432
(561) 361-0004 http://www.esracorp.com
|
10.
Work Unit No.
|
|
11.
Contract or Grant No. SPR-PL-1-(61)
559
|
|
12.
Sponsoring Agency Name and
Address
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 206 S. 17TH AVENUE
PHOENIX, ARIZONA
85007
Project Manager: John Semmens
|
13.Type
of Report and Period Covered
|
|
14.
Sponsoring Agency Code
|
|
15.
Supplementary Notes Prepared in cooperation with the U.S.
Department of Transportation, Federal Highway
Administration
|
|
16.
Abstract
This
one-of-a-kind comprehensive study highlights the
importance of automated testing techniques and the
significance of vision screening measures other than
standard visual acuity testing for assessing all drivers
and, in particular, at-risk drivers and older drivers.
Non-automated tests tend to be subjective, time-consuming,
costly, and heavily reliant on the experience of the
examiner. Due to the high collision, injury, and fatality
rates of all drivers in the State of Arizona, and the
disproportionate number of at-fault older drivers and
collision risks in the States of Arizona and Florida, new
and automated screening methodologies and vision standards
are now needed to promote road safety, predict visual
impairment, and evaluate possible restriction or
confiscation of driver’s licenses. This study
demonstrates that environmental factors and manner of
collisions increase in collision involvement for drivers
between ages 50 to 59 years in both Arizona and Florida.
Drivers age 80 to 89 years in both states are most likely
at-fault in collisions compared to all other age cohorts.
These results are consistent among drivers cited for
collision involvement due to visual defects. Our findings,
which span an 11- year period from 1991 to 2001, not only
apply to Arizona and Florida, two states with some of the
largest proportions of older individuals in the United
States, but, as our global survey of motor vehicle bureau
directors or their representatives of the United States,
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, United Kingdom, Canada, New
Zealand, and Australia illustrate, any state, country,
province, territory, commonwealth, or nation with an
increasing number of older drivers. A pilot study, to
follow, ultimately allows for the implementation of
effective strategies for screening of visual impairment
and eye disease in all Arizona drivers. Snellen acuity,
the most widely used vision testing measure, accounts for
less than 0.1 percent of the visual field and fails to
quantify contrast sensitivity and color vision (Fink and
Sadun, 2004), two of several visual parameters needed for
safe driving. It is recommended that at-risk and older
drivers in Arizona are tested for vision through a newly
designed system of measures provided by two automated
tests (to test vision condition and function) and one
driving simulator (to assess eye status). Hence we
integrate it into a larger system and provide additional
recommendations as these relate to motor vehicle operation
skills and cognition. These automated systems and
methodologies may ultimately serve as a prototype of
transportation license testing improvements for all other
states, countries, and agencies (e.g., aviation, rail,
maritime, commercial vehicles, etc.) to follow. Such
techniques may also reduce the incidence of fraudulent
schemes and issuances of driver’s licenses, commercial
driver’s licenses, and hazardous materials
transportation licenses.
|
|
17.
Key
Words
older driver, at-risk driver, driver’s license
test, UFOV, RAIR, Relative Accident Involvement Ratio,
probabilistic risk assessment, visual acuity, driving
simulator, vision test, dementia, Alzheimer’s Disease,
Parkinson’s Disease, Macular Degeneration, Arizona,
Florida, ESRA Dynamic Vision Assessment for
Transportation, license renewal, automated testing, vision
screening system, ESRA DVAT, ESRA VAPT, ESRA Vision
Assessment Procedure for Transportation, simulator
sickness, flashback effect, aftereffect, cybersickness,
ESRA DAT, driver license test procedure, transportation
license test
|
18.
Distribution Statement Document
is available to the U.S. public through the National
Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia,
22161
|
23.
Registrant’s Seal
|
|
19.
Security Classification Unclassified
|
20.
Security Classification Unclassified
|
21.
No. of Pages 438
|
22.
Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
ESRA DAT ™ System is developed by:
ESRA
Consulting Corporation
ESRA
DAT ™ Sales Division
1650
South Dixie Highway, Third Floor
Boca
Raton, Florida 33432
USA
Telephone:
(561) 361-0004
Arizona
Fax: (520)
844-8555
e-mail:
dat@esracorp.com
web: http://www.esracorp.com

I
dedicate this report to the memory of Max, my grandfather, a
pedestrian statistic. May this report serve as a testament to
his legacy. He is sorely missed.
This
one is for you, Papa.

TABLE
OF CONTENTS
Executive
Summary
Implementation.
Introduction.
Purpose.
Background.
Project
Overview.
Review
of Literature.
Introduction.
The
Older Populations of Arizona and Florida.
Older
Drivers In The News.
Vision
Impairment
Affected
Eye Structures.
Visual
Acuity.
Contrast
Sensitivity.
Color
Vision.
Some
Diseases Of The Eyes.
Refractive
Error.
Infectious
Disorders of the Eye.
Nutritional
And Metabolic Factors.
Alzheimer’s
Disease, Dementia, and Driving.
Some
Driver’s License Vision Testing Policies:
An Overview.
Vision
Testing: Self
Versus Other.
Field
Of Vision Testing.
Older
Versus Younger Drivers.
SURVEY
OF DRIVER’S LICENSE BUREAU DIRECTORS OR THEIR
REPRESENTATIVES.
Analysis
of Collision Data
Introduction.
Methodology.
The
Framework.
Comparison
of Relative Accident Involvement Ratio (RAIR) of
Collisions of Arizona and Florida Drivers,
Years 1991 TO 2001.
Bathtub
Curves.
Descriptive
Statistics and Calculated Risks of
Violations/Behavior-Related Collisions in the State of
Arizona, Years
1991 to 2001.
COMPARISON
OF AVERAGE INDIVIDUAL RISKS OF COLLISIONS, INJURIES, AND
FATALITIES OF ARIZONA AND FLORIDA DRIVERS, YEARS 1991 to
2001.
REVIEWS
OF VISION TESTS AND DRIVING SIMULATORS.
Introduction.
The
History and Future of Vision Tests.
Vision
Screening Tests.
Vision
Screening Methods in Other Settings.
Recommended
Vision Screening Equipment.
Driving
Simulators: Yesterday
and Today.
From
the Past to the Present
Research,
Training, and Screening Usage.
Simulator
Sickness and Aftereffects.
What
is simulator sickness?.
Aftereffects.
Flashback
Effects.
Cyberadaptation
Syndrome and Simulator Adaptation Syndrome.
Factors
of Simulator Sickness.
Simulator
Sickness Studies.
The
Simulator Sickness Questionnaire.
Field
of View and Flicker.
Gender.
Incidence
of simulator sickness.
Impacts
of Cybersickness.
Studies
of At-Risk Drivers.
Simulator
Sickness Mitigation Strategies.
Future
Simulator Sickness Studies.
Safety
Recommendations.
Recent
and Current Driving Simulator Research
Recommended
Driving Simulators
CONCLUSION..
RECOMMENDATIONS.
Vision
Screening System..
Cognition Test
Knowledge
Test
Driving
Test
Driver’s
License Renewal
Additional
Recommendations.
Implementation.
Benefits
of ESRA DVAT ™.
REFERENCES.
APPENDIX
A: Horizontal
section of the human eyeball and some common conditions
that may affect it.
APPENDIX
B: RESULTS
OF GLOBAL SURVEY OF DRIVER’S LICENSE DIRECTORS OR
THEIR REPRESENTATIVES,
YEAR 2004.
APPENDIX
C: COLLISIONS
IN ARIZONA, YEARS 1991 to
2001.
APPENDIX
D: DESCRIPTIVE
STATISTICS OF COLLISIONS, FATALITIES, AND INJURIES OF
ARIZONA AND FLORIDA DRIVERS, YEARS 1991 to 2001.
APPENDIX
E: OVERVIEW OF ARIZONA AND FLORIDA DRIVER’S
LICENSEES, YEARS 1991 to 2001
APPENDIX
F: COMPARATIVE
RATES OF COLLISIONS, FATALITIES, AND INJURIES OF ARIZONA
AND FLORIDA DRIVERS, YEARS 1991 to
2001.
APPENDIX
G: COMPARISON
OF RELATIVE ACCIDENT INVOLVEMENT RATIO (RAIR) OF
COLLISIONS OF ARIZONA AND FLORIDA DRIVERS,
YEARS 1991 to 2001.
APPENDIX
H: RELATIVE
ACCIDENT INVOLVEMENT RATIO OF ARIZONA DRIVERS WITH
CORRECTIVE LENSES, INVOLVED COLLISIONS,
YEARS
1991 to 2001.
APPENDIX
I: RELATIVE
ACCIDENT INVOLVEMENT RATIO OF FLORIDA DRIVERS ASSOCIATED
WITH INJURIES,
YEARS 1991 to 2001.
APPENDIX
J: RELATIVE
ACCIDENT INVOLVEMENT RATIO OF FLORIDA DRIVERS ASSOCIATED
WITH FATALITIES
YEARS 1991 to 2001.
APPENDIX
K: RELATIVE ACCIDENT INVOLVEMENT RATIO OF FLORIDA
DRIVERS ASSOCIATED WITH
COLLISIONS, YEARS 1991 to 2001.
APPENDIX
L: DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS OF WEATHER-RELATED COLLISIONS
IN THE STATE OF ARIZONA,
YEARS 1991 to 2001.
APPENDIX
M: DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS OF LIGHT-RELATED COLLISIONS IN
THE STATE
OF ARIZONA, YEARS 1991 to 2001.
APPENDIX
N: DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS OF MANNER OF COLLISIONS
IN THE STATE OF ARIZONA, Years 1991 to 2001.
APPENDIX
O: DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS OF RESTRICTIONS-RELATED
COLLISIONS IN THE STATE OF ARIZONA, YEARS 1991 TO 2001.
APPENDIX
P: DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS AND CALCULATED RISKS OF
VIOLATIONS / BEHAVIOR-RELATED COLLISIONS IN THE STATE OF
ARIZONA, YEARS 1991 to 2001.
APPENDIX
Q: COMPARISON
OF AVERAGE INDIVIDUAL RISKS OF COLLISIONS, INJURIES, AND
FATALITIES OF ARIZONA AND FLORIDA DRIVERS, YEARS 1991 to
2001.
APPENDIX
R: ARIZONA COLLISION RATES BY RESTRICTIONS, VIOLATIONS,
AND BEHAVIORS, YEARS 1991 to 2001.
APPENDIX
S: VISION SCREENING DEVICES.
APPENDIX
T: DRIVING SIMULATORS.
APPENDIX
U: COMPLETED GLOBAL SURVEYS.
United
States of America and Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
United
Kingdom..
Canada.
Australia.
New
Zealand.
APPENDIX
V: COPY
OF THE SURVEY FORMS.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.
TABLES
FIGURES
GLOSSARY
OF ACRONYMS
3DAGT
3-Dimensional Amsler Grid Test
AAA
American Automobile Association
AAMVA
American Association of Motor Vehicle
Administrators
AD
Alzheimer’s Disease
ADL
Activities of Daily Living
ADOT
The Arizona Department of Transportation
AION
Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy
AMD
Age-Related Macular Degeneration
AUS
Australia
AZ
Arizona
CA
Canada
CMV
Cytomegalovirus Retinitis
CPR
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
DAT
ESRA Dynamic Assessment for Transportation™ (ESRA DAT ™)
DETR
Department of the Environment, Transport and the
Regions (UK)
DfT
United Kingdom Department of Transport
DMV
Department of Motor Vehicles
DVAT |